Sequence analysis and characterization of type I interferon and type II interferon from the critically endangered sturgeon species, A. dabryanus and A. sinensis-长江水产研究所 长江水产研究所

Sequence analysis and characterization of type I interferon and type II interferon from the critically endangered sturgeon species, A. dabryanus and A. sinensis

Abstract:In the present study, we identify three type I interferon (IFN) genes (Ad/AsIFNe1-3) and a type II IFN gene (Ad/AsIFNγ) from the Dabry's sturgeon (Acipenser dabryanus) and the Chinese sturgeon (Acipenser sinensis). Sequence analysis revealed that Ad/AsIFNe1–3 and Ad/AsIFNγ contain several conserved characteristics, including signal peptides, interferon alpha, beta, and delta (IFabd) domains, and N-glycosylation sites. Ad/AsIFNe1-3 belongs to the type I IFN group I subgroup, possessing two conserved cysteines residues (C1 and C3), and Ad/AsIFNγ contained a conserved nuclear localization sequence (NLS) motif. Ad/AsIFNe1-3 and Ad/AsIFNγ contain signaturemotifs indicative of their corresponding IFN group. The Ad/AsIFNe1-3 and Ad/AsIFNγ genes were found to consist of 5 exons/4 introns and 4 exons/3 introns, respectively. These IFNs were separated by four phase 0 introns (type I IFN) and three phase 0 introns (type II IFN). The sequences of IFNe1-3 and IFNγ from the Dabry's sturgeon and the Chinese sturgeon were closely aligned, suggested that these two species are closely related. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that Ad/AsIFNe1-3 and Ad/AsIFNγ clustered together with the corresponding homologous proteins from other fish species. AdIFNe1-3 were found to be high expressed in early embryonic development, suggesting that AdIFNe1-3 might indicate maternal transmission, while AdIFNγ may not mediate embryonic development. Tissue distribution analysis revealed that AdIFNe1-3 and AdIFNγ carry out biological functions in immune and non-immune tissues compartments. AdIFNe1-3 and AdIFNγ can be stimulated by polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (poly I:C) and lipopolysaccharides (LPS). AdIFNe1-3 have stronger antiviral activity than AdIFNγ, and AdIFNγ has a stronger antibacterial activity than AdIFNe1-3. The differential responses of these genes to poly I:C and LPS suggest differences in the mechanisms of defense against viruses and bacteria.